The rate-limitter gets hit on connect, due to historical gossip messages
being exchanged. This results in a high initial burst that needs to be
accounted for.
Relay now has three values: "always", "never" and "auto".
The first two operate like the previous `true`/`false`. The
new (default) value turns relaying on for nodes with public (external)
addresses and off for nodes without. This should reduce redundant traffic on
the network, that was causing the rate limiters to trigger.
With the increase in traffic on the network after launch, the old
defaults don't make sense anymore.
Longer term, we should look into throttling outgoing messages as well,
prioritizing original messages over relayed messages.
If multiple ids are specified for `rad inbox clear`, it would report
that only 1 item was cleared, when in fact multiple were.
This was found to be due to the SQL code returning a change count of
`1`. This is likely due to the way the statement is being reset each
time. The `sqlite` library does not seem to easily support the usage
of `IN` in a `WHERE` clause. So instead, the `count` is aggregated in
the loop and returned instead.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
When a `Patch` or `Issue` is entirely removed from the Git repository,
then there is no update to be made -- instead it should also be
removed from the cache.
This covers the case where the original author of the COB deletes the
COB.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
* Add `--force` flag to force a fetch even if the node is not a seed.
* Don't fail if we can't connect to a node during a fetch.
* More accurately exit when we hit our replica count.
When `--private` is passed to `clone`, we force a fetch from nodes that
aren't known seeds.
When it isn't specified, we skip nodes that aren't known seeds, even if
they are in the preferred seeds list. Previously, we would still fetch
from them, which would cause errors.
Add an example of changing a public repository to a private
repository, noting that any replicated data will be public, but any
new changes will not be replicated.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
There are two areas where we can be more tolerant of delegate namespaces
being missing or not validating:
1. Calculating the canonical HEAD
2. Fetching from a remote
In 1. the protocol is tolerant in that if the local node does not have
the default branch for a delegate, it will still attempt to use any of
the delegates it does have to reach the threshold.
This is made safe by ensuring that if the threshold is being updated
then the node performing the update must have a threshold of delegates
locally in their storage. It also made safe by 2.
In 2. the protocol is tolerant by allowing delegates to be missing
from the serving side, as long as they can still meet a threshold of
delegates. This is further tolerant, when validating the received
data, a threshold of delegates are valid to consider the fetch
successful -- otherwise it will fail.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
When running `rad patch list`, show the set of delegate reviews for
each patch, with the following meaning for the symbols:
- ✔: delegate has accepted the patch
- ✗: delegate has rejected the patch
- -: delegate has not made a verdict on the patch
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
If the user passes a <path> argument to init, it is incorrect and a
bit confusing to reference the "current directory" or "this directory"
e.g. "run rad . in current directory" when the repo was not created in the
current directory and was created with a path argument instead.
Use the path provided by the user in help text, otherwise reference
the current directory.
If `rad id` is called with no arguments, or just `--title` and
`--description`, then it will fail because there were no changes made
to the identity.
Check if the `proposal` document is the same the `current` document,
and if so supply a hint and a better error.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Help the user know which revision they currently have checked out when
running `rad patch checkout`.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
If an ancestry check of an annotated tag was triggered then the fetch
from that peer would fail. This is due to `graph_ahead_behind` only
working for commit-ish objects.
To allow for annotated tags, and other object that peel to commits,
the check now peels the two objects to commits before getting their
`Oid`s. The call to `graph_ahead_behind` can take these two `Oid`s
instead.
A test for annotated tags is included as part of the `examples/git`
suite in the CLI tests.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
No tests for `rad patch delete` existed.
Add a test where two peers interact on a patch and one decides to
delete the patch. It ensures that the patch is still visible to the
peer that did not delete the patch.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
To make things a little more consistent, move the `rad self --address`
command to `rad node config --addresses`, since it's more about
externally-facing configuration of the node, rather than your local user
or profile.
Previously, authorization was only checked for ops after the root op.
We also avoid creating empty actions for `assign` and `label`, which
was needed for non-authorized users to be able to create issues/patches.
This makes the default policy `block` with scope `all`. The good thing
about this is that you don't have to manage individual nodes in the
beginning. You simply seed the repos you want, and everything is
followed within those repos. This matches user expectations, as `rad
seed` does what you expect it to do.
For open-policy seed nodes, it also means that simply changing `block`
to `allow` from the default config is all you need.
This leaves the non-default `followed` scope as a more "advanced"
setting, since it is much more cumbersome: it forces you to follow a
user before you can see their issues/patches, which is not something
most users expect coming from old-shcool forges.
Shows you updates on local repositories.
Included here is a basic implementation of a notification system. A new
database is created and updated after every fetch, with refs that have
changed.
The `rad inbox` command can then list items in the database and delete
them.
When using `network: "test"`, we shouldn't default to any public seed
node. This change makes sure that the "preferredSeeds" configuration var
is only given a value when `network` is `main`.
The command now works with both a replica target *and* a seeds target.
This is especially useful to eg. ensure that a preferred seed has been
synced, while still trying to hit a higher replica count.
Introduce pinned repositories to the `profile::Config`, i.e.
`config.json`.
This is used for pinning repositories in the httpd `/projects` handle.
To allow returning all repositories, an `all` query parameter is also
included.
This is non-backwards compatible change, since we introduce the `show`
query parameter which, if not supplied, will default to `pinned`.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
In the case where we don't find any seeds, display a better error
message.
We also don't bail out on error, since the announcement step might still
be worth trying.
Previously, COB change commits would not distinguish between their
parents. This means that they would try to load source code commits
(eg. for patch COBs) and then fail since those commits wouldn't have a
manifest or `Rad-Resource`.
We introduce a backwards compatible change here which is that parent
oids that are not COB commits are accompanied by a commit trailer called
`Rad-Related`. This is for all related content that should be pulled in
but is not part of the change graph proper.
When building the change graph, we simply ignore commits that are marked
as "related".
We were using the two pretty interchangeably. "Project" should only be
used to refer to the repository payload. "Repository" should be used
when referring to the resource that is fetched, synced, cloned, checked
out etc.
cloudhead
Fintan Halpenny
Alexis Sellier
josibake