This new trait is used when only signing refs is needed, and not general
write access to a repository.
We also implement `ReadRepository` and `SignRepository` for
`DraftStore`.
The additional flexibility in choosing a backend for the COB store will
allow things like "draft" COBs that are stored in a different location,
without changing much of the logic.
This patch incorporates several important changes to code review:
* Code review verdict is no longer editable
* Made reviews redactable instead
* Renamed review top-level comment to "summary"
* Renamed inline comments to "comments"
* Made inline comments addressable by `EntryId`
* This is to allow for editing
* Removed inline comments from review creation
* Added a `CodeComment` action instead
* Removed `Semilattice` instance from `Review`
* Added a `EditReview` action instead to have more control
* Made it valid for revisions to be redacted concurrently with a review/merge
Most of these changes are needed to support proper inline code comments.
There were a few subtle issues with the apply logic of certain COBs
that should be fixed now.
Note that the underlying store guarantees exactly-once delivery, and so
it does not make sense to test idempotence at the patch level.
* `CodeLocation` had a `blob` and `commit` field. These are redundant,
since the review lives under a revision.
We also change the line range to be diff-compatible, with an old and
new range. The ranges are optional to account for different scenarios
like file deletion, move etc.
* `CodeComment` had redundant getters which were removed in favor of
public fields. We also remove the `timestamp` field, as it will be
the same as the review timestamp.
We test to make sure that in the event of concurrent operations,
traversal order is deterministic.
This required some changes to the testing infrastructure. We're also
able to simplify the `Actor` type that now has redundant functionality.
Though these are perhaps not the final error types, we name them the same
across COBs and have them work the same way.
All COB modules now have a `Error` enum.
In a future change, we may want the `FromHistory` trait to support
multiple error types, eg. one for `apply` and one for `validate`.
This adds a simple `validate` function to COBs that is run on load. It
allows COBs to check whether they are valid, once all operations are
loaded, and return an error if not.
We change `Patch::latest` to always return something, because a patch is
malformed if it doesn't have at least one revision, and thus would not
load in the first place.
This also implies that there is a latest revision in the face of
concurrent updates.
Note that currently, traversal order for concurrent updates is still random.
This will be fixed in another patch.
Before this change, if a merge op referred to a commit that was not on
the default branch, the merge op and all descendant ops would be pruned.
This is a bad idea because the state of the default branch can change
*after* the merge op is created, which is out of the control of the
merge op author.
Therefore, instead of exiting, we keep processing ops (but ignore the
merge), in case the merge is invalid for this specific reason.
When applying a `Merge` action, we verify that the commit is in the
history of the default branch of that user.
Since this is not the case when issuing a `rad merge`, and since that
command is no longer needed with the push-based merge, we remove the
`rad merge` command completely.
Move `merges` from `Revision` to `Patch`, and key them by actor.
This ensures that only one merge is possible per actor. We also make
sure that only one revision can be merged at a time, and signal a
conflict if more than one revision is considered merged.
Finally, we make sure that merges have the same target-branch commit
to be considered equal.
Allows patches to have their state updated to `Merged` with a `git push`
to the default branch.
Currently, due to the limitations of the COB store, this requires a
linear search through all patches. This will eventually become a problem
when projects have thousands of patches, so we should look into
long-term solutions.
This change updates to the latest radicle-git-ext, which required a
few changes within the radicle family of crates.
One set of changes is that the radicle-git-ext crate subsumes
git-commit, git-trailers, and git-ref-format -- so all those imports
go through radicle-git-ext.
The commit code requires that parent `Oid`s point to commits, which
made some tests fail. One of the reasons for these failures is that
the patch tests used fabricated `Oid`s and so the verification would
fail. This is fixed by allowing the test context code to create
`PatchRequest`s that create valid commits.
The other reason for failure was that the identity `Action` passed an
`Oid` that pointed to a blob. This is fixed by removing that code and
making a note of it in documentation.
The final major change was moving the Refspec type into git-ref-format
and removing the AsRefspecs trait. The trait was not required and
could its usage could be replaced by simpler code.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Add a test case showing that when a review is made with a None value
to an already set field, it will remove the original value.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
This allows change commits to have more than one parent that isn't
part of the DAG.
We can use this to create dependencies towards git objects such as
commits, in the case of patch actions.
When a merge is applied to a patch, we check whether the threshold
of delegates has been reached, at which point we set the patch status
to `merged`.
This requires threading the identity document oid through the "apply"
process.
Revision IDs are globally unique. Users will be able to use the
Revision ID in place of its patch ID.
Make `rad merge` refuse to merge an older revision unless the `--force`
option is given.
Using LWWReg::from will always set the clock value to the default,
which can end up being used wrong.
Instead, introduce a constructor method `initial` to indicate that it
should be used on initial construction, while `new` should be used for
newer values of the register.
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Replaces pub accessors to struct fields with methods
Also creates some methods to compute necessary information
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Martinez <me@sebastinez.dev>
To be able to change the description of a patch revision, without the
need to create a new revision.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Martinez <me@sebastinez.dev>
Using LWWReg::from was giving subsequent actions
the same clock value as their predecessors.
This resulted in a Reject not being able
to turn into an Accept on a second review of a patch.
The solution is to use the clock value that was produced for the Op
and pass that into new, avoiding the call to from.
Co-authored-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fintan Halpenny <fintan.halpenny@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Martinez <me@sebastinez.dev>
We implement a new `Element` trait which allows for more complex output
to be drawn, such as vertical and horizontal stacks.
We adapt `Table` to work within this system.
We refresh the output of `rad patch show` to use these new tools.
For display purposes in the web client, we add with this commit the
some needed properties to the revisions in the patch endpoint.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Martinez <me@sebastinez.dev>
By introducing a small limitation: only allowing entries in the change
graph to be addressable, instead of individual operations; we
drastically simplify the CRDT implementation.
There are four advantages:
1. Op ids are just regular SHA-1s
2. There's no need for relative IDs, ops never refer to other ops within the
same commit
3. There's no need for a nonce, since commits can't collide, and neither can op IDs
4. `OpId` can just be an alias of `EntryId`
The disadvantage of course, is that we have to be mindful of how we
create op transactions, since each transaction creates an addressable
unit. For example, we must not include multiple patch revisions in the
same transaction.
It's fairly easy for a user to (by mistake or intentionally) create two
operations with the same OpId. This patch makes it much less likely,
and ensures that if the OpId is equal, it's because the operations
are identical.
Alexis Sellier
Slack Coder
Fintan Halpenny
Sebastian Martinez